Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

用心思考

void alarm(void)

{

Add a sentence

if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)

Alarm=0; //Statements to be skipped

if(carry_count*250+pulse_count<alarm_h)

Alarm=1; //Statement to be executed

}

I want to check before execution if Alarm=0; then skip if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)

Alarm=0; directly execute the following statement,

小鹰fighting

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm==0) goto LABEL； if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statement LABEL to be skipped: if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Build target 'Target 1' assembling STARTUP.A51... compiling chengxu.c... CHENGXU.C(218): error C202: 'LABEL': undefined identifier CHENGXU.C(221): error C233: 'LABEL': undefined label Target not created

void alarm(void)

{

if(Alarm==0)

goto LABEL;

（A)if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)

Alarm=0;

LABEL:

(B)if(carry_count*250+pulse_count<alarm_h)

Alarm=1;

}

If Alarm=0, jump to (B), otherwise execute (A). I tried it, but it doesn't work.

void alarm(void) { switch(alarm) case(1):if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; //Statements to be skipped case(0):if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

This should be simple. First check whether Alarm is waiting for 1. If it is, all statements are executed. If it is not waiting for 1 (that is, waiting for 0), only if (carry_count*250+pulse_count) is executed.=alarm_l) Alarm=0; //Statements to be skipped} if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

I'm confused. None of them work.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//statements to be skipped}else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; // statement to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count=alarm_l) Alarm=0; This sentence directly executes the following statement,

void alarm(void) { switch(Alarm){ case(0):break; case(1): if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count Alarm=1;//Statements to be executed break; default; } }

goto is definitely OK, I suspect your logic has been optimized by the compiler. Don't worry about it, as long as the result is correct.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped} else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

There are many ways to write programs, and many of them are written according to your requirements. However, what I want to know is why do you do this? I think this problem can be solved by itself after a period of time, and by that time you will find that these problems today are nothing, or you will wonder why I wrote it this way in the first place?

void alarm(void) { if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0)) Alarm=0; if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void) { if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0)) Alarm=0; if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

用心思考

Build target 'Target 1'
assembling STARTUP.A51...
compiling chengxu.c...
CHENGXU.C(218): error C202: 'LABEL': undefined identifier
CHENGXU.C(221): error C233: 'LABEL': undefined label
Target not created

用心思考

void alarm(void)

{

if(Alarm==0)

goto LABEL;

（A)if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)

Alarm=0;

LABEL:

(B)if(carry_count*250+pulse_count<alarm_h)

Alarm=1;

}

If Alarm=0, jump to (B), otherwise execute (A). I tried it, but it doesn't work.

zca123

void alarm(void) { switch(alarm) case(1):if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; //Statements to be skipped case(0):if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

This should be simple. First check whether Alarm is waiting for 1. If it is, all statements are executed. If it is not waiting for 1 (that is, waiting for 0), only if (carry_count*250+pulse_count) is executed.=alarm_l) Alarm=0; //Statements to be skipped} if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

I'm confused. None of them work.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//statements to be skipped}else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; // statement to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count=alarm_l) Alarm=0; This sentence directly executes the following statement,

void alarm(void) { switch(Alarm){ case(0):break; case(1): if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count Alarm=1;//Statements to be executed break; default; } }

goto is definitely OK, I suspect your logic has been optimized by the compiler. Don't worry about it, as long as the result is correct.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped} else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

There are many ways to write programs, and many of them are written according to your requirements. However, what I want to know is why do you do this? I think this problem can be solved by itself after a period of time, and by that time you will find that these problems today are nothing, or you will wonder why I wrote it this way in the first place?

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

banqiao

This should be simple. First check whether Alarm is waiting for 1. If it is, all statements are executed. If it is not waiting for 1 (that is, waiting for 0), only if (carry_count*250+pulse_count) is executed.=alarm_l) Alarm=0; //Statements to be skipped} if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

I'm confused. None of them work.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//statements to be skipped}else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; // statement to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count=alarm_l) Alarm=0; This sentence directly executes the following statement,

void alarm(void) { switch(Alarm){ case(0):break; case(1): if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count Alarm=1;//Statements to be executed break; default; } }

goto is definitely OK, I suspect your logic has been optimized by the compiler. Don't worry about it, as long as the result is correct.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped} else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

There are many ways to write programs, and many of them are written according to your requirements. However, what I want to know is why do you do this? I think this problem can be solved by itself after a period of time, and by that time you will find that these problems today are nothing, or you will wonder why I wrote it this way in the first place?

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

用心思考

I'm confused. None of them work.

y789

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//statements to be skipped}else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; // statement to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count=alarm_l) Alarm=0; This sentence directly executes the following statement,

void alarm(void) { switch(Alarm){ case(0):break; case(1): if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count Alarm=1;//Statements to be executed break; default; } }

goto is definitely OK, I suspect your logic has been optimized by the compiler. Don't worry about it, as long as the result is correct.

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped} else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

There are many ways to write programs, and many of them are written according to your requirements. However, what I want to know is why do you do this? I think this problem can be solved by itself after a period of time, and by that time you will find that these problems today are nothing, or you will wonder why I wrote it this way in the first place?

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

用心思考

void alarm(void) { add a sentence if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0; // statement to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count=alarm_l) Alarm=0; This sentence directly executes the following statement,

zca123

void alarm(void) { switch(Alarm){ case(0):break; case(1): if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped if(carry_count*250+pulse_count Alarm=1;//Statements to be executed break; default; } }

huo_hu

goto is definitely OK, I suspect your logic has been optimized by the compiler. Don't worry about it, as long as the result is correct.

aifei7320

void alarm(void) { if(Alarm!=0) { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l) Alarm=0;//Statements to be skipped} else { if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

There are many ways to write programs, and many of them are written according to your requirements. However, what I want to know is why do you do this? I think this problem can be solved by itself after a period of time, and by that time you will find that these problems today are nothing, or you will wonder why I wrote it this way in the first place?

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

风亦路

There are many ways to write programs, and many of them are written according to your requirements. However, what I want to know is why do you do this? I think this problem can be solved by itself after a period of time, and by that time you will find that these problems today are nothing, or you will wonder why I wrote it this way in the first place?

yipengjiusui

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),

yipengjiusui

void alarm(void)
{
  if((carry_count*250+pulse_count>=alarm_l)&&(Alarm != 0))
  Alarm=0;

  if(carry_count*250+pulse_count

Ask questions (reward 10 core coins),