Which one has better price/performance ratio, STM32 F0 series or L0 series?

damiaa

Which one has better price/performance ratio, STM32 F0 series or L0 series? [Copy link]

STM32 has released the complete F0 series and L0 series. Sometimes I get confused: F0 is cheap, and using EEPROM requires an external L0, which consumes less power. L0 also has an internal EEPROM. Do you all use L0 or F0? What is the price/performance ratio? What do you think? By the way, we currently use F0 external EEPROM. The reason: STM32F030 is cheaper, 33-pin and 48-pin, about 4. EEPROM 16K 24LC16 is 6 to 7 cents. This post is for the case where F0 and L0 can be used at the same time.

damiaa

It seems that it is better to stick with F0.

zhang7309

It depends on whether the project focuses more on power consumption or cost. For low power consumption, use the L0 series.

damiaa

I just checked and found that the prices of STC8051 chips have been lowered. It seems that STM32F0 has great killing power.

dcexpert

If the requirements are not high, Flash can also be used as EEPROM.

zca123

It is very convenient to have an internal eeprom. An external eeprom may cause data loss.

damiaa

zca123 posted on 2017-1-17 14:15 Having an internal EEPROM is very convenient. An external EEPROM may cause data loss.

The data will not be lost, but it takes up space, which is not pleasant. Second, if low power consumption is a concern, an external EEPROM is not good for power consumption.