Where is the c2000 section heading?

鸽子

Where is the c2000 section heading? [Copy link]

TI has recently redefined C2000 and renamed it DSC, Digital Signal Controller. Obviously, it has been classified as MCU by TI. Sister Linzi suggested moving this section to the microcontroller and putting it together with the MUC. I think it is still necessary to keep it under DSP. In this regard, I hope everyone can express their opinions and discuss where this section should be placed?

soso

Originally posted by Pigeon on 2010-2-4 14:49 TI has recently redefined C2000 and renamed it DSC, Digital Signal Controller. Apparently, it has been classified as MCU by TI. Sister Linzi suggested moving this section to the microcontroller section and putting it together with the MUC. I think it is still necessary to keep it under DSP. On this point, I hope everyone will express their opinions...

Haha, this is the first post. Please help to give a thumbs up HOHO. Let's put it in the DSP2000 section first. Why not let everyone talk about how to do our section well?

sjl2001

TI's DSP should be independent and keep an independent section, because TI's C2000 series is 32-bit, while ordinary microcontrollers are 8 or 16-bit. Besides, there are so many users of TI products, and they all know that the C2000 series is a DSP. If it is changed like this, some people will be at a loss. It is recommended to keep it independent.

gaoxiao

Market-oriented, no one denies the essence of DSP just because it has changed its name! ! ! !

鸽子

Well said haha